Curious-looking lumpfish proving its worth in fight against sea lice
Working with Grieg Seafood Shetland, Benchmark’s team in Shetland are seeing great results from lumpfish produced at its recently revamped production facility at Sandwick with some Grieg sites reporting a reduction in lice burden of up to 70 per cent
With its bulging eyes and toad-like complexion, Cyclopterus lumpus might not quite be an obvious Hollywood hero, but it is now seen as having a key role in the growth of Shetland’s salmon aquaculture industry.
These hopes have been intensified by the establishment of the islands’ first commercial-scale production facility for the creature more commonly known as the lumpfish or lumpsucker. While a lone lumpsucker might not make much of a difference, having a hatchery that aims to produce several million of them a year raises expectations considerably. For it’s not just the outlandish looks of the lumpfish that attract attention: it also has an ability to help the salmon sector overcome its biggest problem – thanks to its taste for picking parasitic sea lice off their salmonid hosts.
Cleaning up sea lice in Shetland
Mothballed since the collapse of the islands’ cod aquaculture industry in 2008, the former No Catch hatchery at Broonies Taing, in Sandwick, is once more full of life – both human and piscine. Its tanks, long since empty of cod, are now occupied by hundreds of thousands of the lumpfish, which are being looked after by a team assembled by Benchmark’s FAI Aquaculture – the newest addition to the archipelago’s impressive fish farming sector.
“FAI and our sister company StofnFiskur supply lumpfish across Scotland and Iceland and – through Iceland – to the Faroe Islands,” explains Ben Perry, technical director of Benchmark’s FAI Aquaculture. “These are grown from eggs harvested from fish caught by Iceland’s lumpfish caviar fishery – it’s MSC certified, so highly sustainable.
It’s a project that FAI has devoted considerable resources to in recent years.
We have the capacity to produce just over 3 million lumpfish a year in Scotland. We started the project in January 2016 and put our first fish out to sea that autumn. This year our target is to produce 1.3 million lumpfish across our two sites – Sandwick in Shetland and Aultbea in Wester Ross – and we have aspirations in 2018 to produce over 2 million.
Ben Perry, FAI Aquaculture’s Technical Director, works closely with customers such as Greig Seafood Shetland.
Although it might have accounted for almost a quarter of the salmon produced in Scotland in 2016, salmon harvests in Shetland have tailed off in recent years. With 27 sites currently dormant or mothballed, it’s no surprise that volumes fell from a ten-year high of 46,000 tonnes in 2014 to closer to 40,000 tonnes last year. However, lumpfish could be key in helping to reverse this trend.
Grieg Seafood Shetland (GSS), is one of three farms – along with Cooke Aquaculture Scotland and Scottish Sea Farms – who are currently producing salmon in Shetland, and all three are now beginning to invest in lumpfish as one of their key means of combatting lice.
Lump fish come from eggs sourced from Iceland’s MSC-certified lumpfish fishery
As Grant Cumming, managing director of GSS, reflects: “We see from examples in parts of Norway and Scotland that cleaner fish can be used successfully over area management zones to keep sea lice infection pressure low throughout the cycle”.
However, he is also aware that such a strategy will only be truly effective if it’s pursued in earnest by all of the archipelago’s salmon producers and he hopes that the initiative will encourage greater collaboration between the competing farms.
We see no reason why it should not be possible by knowledge transfer and working closely with our neighbours that we cannot repeat that success in Shetland.
“We started working with lumpfish in 2014 and we had a lot of trouble with bacterial problems, but recently we’ve had very good results,” Adam reflects, “and at one site this year we stocked half the cages with lumpfish and half without. Those that had the lumpfish experienced a 70 percent reduction in lice levels within eight weeks – and have managed to keep the lice levels consistently lower – so it was definitely not down to chance.”
Such good results have inspired many farmers to reconsider their initial opinions about cleaner fish.
“On site we struggled to find buy-in. Farmers didn’t see it as something that was going to work… It was voodoo,” recalls Adam. “But now, after a couple of years and several generations, we’ve managed to get them onside. It took a lot of work, management and farmers working together, but now we see the results everyone’s on-board.”
I was pretty sceptical about using lumpfish. The first time we used them here we probably overlooked them slightly. This time, however, we’ve prioritised looking after the lumpfish more. I don’t think it’s going to be a cure, but they will play a big part in keeping down lice levels, which is obviously our biggest challenge here.
Room for improvement
Such a promising performance at a single site is not enough to suggest that lumpfish can be a panacea against lice, but – given the fact that there is still a great deal to learn about their behaviour – it seems likely that their efficacy as louse eaters can be improved.
“I think we have a lot of the production challenges dealt with; the real challenge now is getting consistency in performance once they’ve been deployed in marine sites,” Ben explains. “Now we need to work with our clients on training and in-cage handling systems to try and get the best out of these cleaner fish.”
And, although the lumpfish do require a certain amount of onsite attention, improvements in feeds, enhanced feeding mechanisms and the provision of a suitable habitat for them within the cages are all helping to boost their performance without too much hassle.
They do create more work, with feeding and keeping the nets clean [to prevent the lumpfish from grazing on the growth on the nets and ignoring the lice] but it’s fairly steady, and the day-to-day work of feeding and checking the hides isn’t any great hardship.
Lumpfish are around 7 to 8 months old when they are transferred to salmon farms.
Selection of treatments
One of the advantages of using lumpfish rather than other treatment methods is that their deployment is neither stressful for the salmon nor does it interrupt the host fish’s daily routines.
They’re one of the only strategies that allow you to leave the salmon alone to grow naturally; you’re not having to handle the fish, which is a fantastic advantage.
Nevertheless, they are unlikely to be the only method to use against the perennial parasite problem.
“While there’s going to be a move towards cleaner fish, there’s going to have to be a balanced approach,” agrees Ben, “and there will still be a requirement to use targeted pharmaceuticals as well, and also mechanical treatments – because you’re up against a challenge that is quite substantial.”
Indeed, the scale of the lice challenge in Shetland means that, according to Adam, it is wise to have a relatively high ratio of lumpfish to salmon – perhaps about twice the accepted industry standard of around 1:10 (ie one for every ten salmon).
“The last site we stocked had ten cages and the ratio of lumpfish to salmon varied – from about ten to 20 percent. We found those stocked with 15 to 20 percent were the most effective,” says Adam. “As a result, I think it’s best if we aim to stock all our sites at 20 percent [ie one lumpfish for every five salmon] initially, and then look to bring this down gradually, as they have an impact on lice levels over time.”
The scale of the lice challenge in Shetland means that a high ratio (5:1) of lumpfish to salmon is needed
Adam hopes that all the company’s sites in Shetland and Skye will contain lumpfish by the end of 2018, and having a local source should not only increase the quantity but also the quality of the lumpfish available – with the salmon producers benefitting from the possibility of rapid deployment, and the lumpfish from the short transport time required to get from Sandwick to other parts of Shetland.
The cleaner fish expert is also pleased with how the first few batches from the Shetland facility have performed.
“The quality of the fry from Sandwick has been the best I’ve ever seen,” he reflects, “and there has been very, very minimal mortality when we’ve added them to the cages.”
Greig's cleaner fish expert is pleased with how the first few batches have performed
We are delighted to have a lumpsucker hatchery on our doorstep. We know that transportation is stressful to fish and minimising transport time and distance is always our aim. It also will allow us to develop a closer relationship with the producer and to share knowledge throughout the lifecycle, which we hope will allow both FAI and ourselves make better decisions for the cleaner fish.
And building this relationship between the salmon producer and the lumpfish supplier is an element that Ben sees as being crucial for the success of any cleaner fish project.
“I think that being able to offer our customers support once they’ve taken the cleaner fish is key – we’re all still learning how best to use and look after lumpsuckers and our involvement doesn’t stop when they leave the hatchery door.
We’re here to help with training and the deployment of the fish, as there’s so much to learn about how to get the most from these cleaner fish. It’s still virtually a brand-new species for aquaculture,” he points out.